CHINAMacroReporter

Xi Jinping's Leadership: 'The Inevitable Outcome of History'

Mr. Xi is the hero of a Resolution on the history of the Chinese Communist Party that painted his leadership as the inevitable outcome of history and all but gave him his third term. Tony Saich of the Harvard Kennedy School did a terrific analysis on this - you'll find it below, after my take.
by

|

CHINADebate

November 23, 2021
Xi Jinping's Leadership: 'The Inevitable Outcome of History'

Of late, the spotlight has been on Xi Jinping.

  • Mr. Xi is the hero of a Resolution on the history of the Chinese  Communist Party that painted his leadership as the inevitable outcome of history and all but gave him his third term.
  • Tony Saich of the Harvard Kennedy School did a terrific analysis on this - you'll find it below, after my take.

And Mr. Xi was one side of the first face-to-face, albeit virtual, call with President Biden.

  • Not much happened.
  • But as so many commentators about the call reminded us, 'Jaw jaw is better than war war,' quoting Winston Churchill.

Mr. Xi's jaw jaw to Mr. Biden was summed up by The Economist this way:

  • ‘China’s plan for world peace: America stops defying China.’
  • As The Economist explains and, as I've written here before, China places all the blame for the problems in the relationship on the U.S.

But as we know, in all fraught relationships there are two sides to the story.

  • And Mr. Biden did a good job in telling his.

Not that you would know that if you read only the also inevitable hits from the right.

  • Most of those can be dismissed, but John Bolton's Wall Street Journal op-ed shouldn't be. (You'll find it below after Tony Saich's analysis.)

Mr. Bolton  points out that

  • ‘America has no China strategy 10 months after President Biden’s inauguration.’
  • ‘Monday’s Zoom meeting between Mr. Biden and Xi Jinping only highlighted that void.’ Ouch.

Many before Mr. Biden though have tried to be the George Kennan (who came up with the strategy of containment that eventually ended the Cold War) of the age and failed.

  • But difficult or not, the U.S. has to articulate a coherent set of objectives for and policies in dealing with China.

And Mr. Bolton suggests a path that I fully associate myself with:

  • ‘China is not yet at the forefront of public consciousness.
  • ‘To ensure America’s eventual strategy is workable, political leaders need to debate the challenges so citizens can appreciate the implications of the choices they will have to make.’
  • ‘If Mr. Biden doesn’t use his Presidency’s bully pulpit to launch that debate, his potential opponents should.’ Amen.

That debate is long overdue.

  • But my breath is not being held waiting for America's leaders from both parties to get it started.

Anyway please have a look at my take on these issues and be sure to read Dr. Saich and Mr. Bolton's essays.

  • And send me your thoughts.

1 | And Then There Were Three

‘The historiographical equivalent of bulldozing a cemetery.’

The Resolution that shows how Xi Jinping's leadership is 'the inevitable outcome of history' is a little long, a little tedious, but a must-read or at least a must-skim to understand how the Party – and more importantly, Xi Jinping – have decided they want to be viewed.

  • ‘Huge resources are dedicated to crafting an official history to be accepted by all,’ writes Tony Saich of the Harvard Kennedy School in ‘Xi Jinping has made sure history is now officially on his side’ [read his full analysis below]. ‘Woe betide anyone who challenges the official narrative.’
  • This means you. So get with the program.

The Resolution was recently adopted at the recent Sixth Plenum of the Chinese Communist Party.

The Sixth Plenum of the cycle is the big deal.

  • ‘Chairman Mao Zedong once remarked that “The sixth plenum determines the fate of China,”’ writes MacroPolo’s Ruihan Huang.
  • ‘Indeed, the sixth plenum of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 19th Central Committee (CC) will determine the course of Chinese politics over the next five years and beyond.’
  • Many say that this year's Sixth Plenum will determine ‘the fate of China’ not for the next five years but for the next 100 years.

So what happened? Here’s Dr. Saich again:

  • ‘Ostensibly the meeting was held to review the Party's achievements of the past 100 years. In reality, it was about the future.’
  • ‘One outcome of the meeting was the publication of a resolution on past achievements, which was designed to show that Xi Jinping’s leadership today and in the future is the inevitable outcome of history.’
  • ‘The resolution will consolidate his pre-eminence within the party, empowering him to set the course for its second 100 years.’

For Mr. Xi too, the Resolution brought him closer to being seen as an equal to Mao and Deng.

  • ‘It was the party’s third historical summation, placing Xi alongside Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping, who oversaw the first two.’

‘The first two resolutions criticised the past to legitimise setting out on a brave new path forward.’

  • ‘For Mao in 1945, it was the last nail in the coffin of his rivals for party leadership by exposing their “leftist” mistakes, which had almost brought the party to ruin.’
  • ‘For Deng, the challenge was to break with the immediate disasters of the Great Leap Forward famine and the political turmoil of the Cultural Revolution, without discrediting Mao entirely. It enabled China to move into the reform era.’

‘Xi’s purpose is distinct.’

  • ‘He is not defining the way forward by criticising the recent past but rather by highlighting how the past plays into his hands.’

‘The spotlight was on Xi, his achievements, the wrongs he has righted, and the future direction for China.’

  • ‘The resolution described Xi as the “principal founder” of the party’s ruling ideology and the “core” of its leadership; it is intended to be the key document for all party members to unite around, eradicating challenges to his policy preferences.’

'Barring an accident of nature, Xi will be reappointed for a third term as party general secretary at the 20th party congress (to take place in November 2022).'

  • 'This will allow for policy continuity, rather than policy change as occurred after the previous two historical resolutions.'

I have written before that we could look at Mao, Deng, and Xi as three leaders who performed experiments to shape China each in his own vision.

  • History (not the Resolution's history) tells us that Mao’s experiment failed and Deng’s succeeded.
  • How Mr. Xi’s experiment will turn out will not be known for some time – he could very well fail and a new Deng appear with a new experiment to clean up after him.

For now, as Dr. Saich says,

  • ‘While there are murmurs of opposition, the historic plenary session would suggest that the future is in Xi’s hands.’

‘However, when politics is so deeply personalised and centralised, there is only one person to blame if things go wrong.’

  • ‘Unless, of course, we get a new resolution on history that tells us who led the party astray, despite Xi’s earnest attempts to keep policy on the straight and narrow.’

2 | Biden & Xi Have a Chat

The Objective Take. ‘After nearly 10 months of open hostilities between China and the United States since Joe Biden took office in January, the first face-to-face meeting between him and Chinese President Xi Jinping has brought a sigh of relief around the world,’ writes Wang Xiangwei of the South China Morning Post.

  • ‘The virtual summit, which lasted 3½ hours, may have produced no breakthroughs, but the mere fact that they met, agreed to disagree on a host of issues, and promised to ‘improve communication and avoid veering into conflict, was viewed to be a positive development in many quarters.’

The Chinese Take. According to The New York Times:

  • ‘The official Chinese summary of the call said that Mr. Xi told Mr. Biden that the U.S. government’s policies toward China had strained relations, and that it was in both countries’ interests to avoid confrontation.

‘The policies that the United States has adopted toward China for some period of time have pushed Chinese-U.S. relations into serious difficulties, and this is out of step with the fundamental interests of both countries’ peoples and the shared interests of every country in the world,” Mr. Xi said, according to a summary of the call issued online by the Chinese Foreign Ministry.'

  • ' “Whether China and the United States can properly handle mutual relations is a question for the century that concerns the fate of the world, and both countries must answer it.” ’

Or, as The Economist story’s subheading sums it up:

  • ‘China’s plan for world peace: America stops defying China.’

More from The Economist on the call that highlight the difficulty of the two sides reaching some accommodation:

  • ‘Mr Biden is presented in China as a more pragmatic president than his predecessor.’
  • ‘Alas, scholars and state media frame his willingness to talk as an admission of American failure.’

‘In China’s telling, American inflation is linked to Trump-imposed trade tariffs (though inflation is recent and tariffs have been in place for three years).’

  • ‘Chinese analysts blame another complex problem, supply-chain chaos, on a simple cause: Trump-era attempts to block exports of semiconductors and other advanced technology to China, while urging firms to move factories out of China.’

‘With the American economy now in “bleak” shape, the Biden administration “needs to ease relations with China in order to improve its political standing at home”, says Wang Yong, director of Peking University’s American studies centre.’

  • ‘Professor Wang adds that America is losing the hearts and minds of younger Chinese, who have “given up their illusions” that the West is sincere when it expresses concerns about Muslims in Xinjiang or democrats in Hong Kong.’
  • ‘China’s leaders still want investment and technology from the West, but they think it is in decadent decline and are decoupling from Western norms and ideas.’

Talk about a tough audience.

  • But the one at home is even tougher.

The U.S. (Partisan) Take. John Bolton in his Wall Street Journal op-ed [more from that below] on the call, ‘Biden Has a Summit with Xi, but No Strategy for China,’ writes:

  • ‘America has no China strategy 10 months after President Biden’s inauguration.’
  • ‘Monday’s Zoom meeting between Mr. Biden and Xi Jinping only highlighted that void.’ Ouch.

As for the call itself, I am in the camp of those many pundits who quoted over and over Winston Churchill that it is better to ‘jaw jaw than to war war.’ Not Mr. Bolton.

  • ‘Dulcet tones and torrents of presidential words are no substitute for clear policies,’ says Mr. Bolton – and he’s also right.
  • For jaw jaw to be better than war war, the jaw jaw has to come from reasonable objectives, persistently pursued. That is, from a strategy, which Mr. Bolton says Mr. Biden lacks.

China has oft-stated objectives and clear, if evolving, policies for attaining them.

  • In other words, a strategy.

The United States doesn’t have one yet.

  • Mr. Biden’s China objectives aren’t clear, and his policies also are evolving - so these have yet to congeal into a comprehensive strategy.
  • (For my part, I'm in the wait and see mode, cautiously optimistic.)

And that’s okay.

  • Because this creates an opportunity if the leaders of both parties are up to it. (Breath not being held.)

For, as Mr. Bolton so rightly points out:

  • ‘China is not yet at the forefront of public consciousness.
  • ‘To ensure America’s eventual strategy is workable, political leaders need to debate the challenges so citizens can appreciate the implications of the choices they will have to make.’
  • ‘If Mr. Biden doesn’t use his Presidency’s bully pulpit to launch that debate, his potential opponents should.’ Amen.
  • That debate is long overdue.

The problem of course is that the best strategies from the U.S. and China, no matter how well they are shaped and how clearly communicated, may be so inimical that armed conflict cannot be avoided.

  • As Mr. Xi implies, this is 'the question of the century.'

More

CHINAMacroReporter

August 24, 2023
Xi Jinping: 'The East is Rising' | Yes. Rising against China
All our careful analyses of PLA capabilities, the parsing of Mr. Xi’s and Mr. Biden’s statements, the predictions as to the year of the invasion, everything – all out the window. This is one you won’t see coming – but one you have to have prepared for.
keep reading
July 23, 2023
‘The U.S. Has Tactics, But No China Strategy’ | Bill Zarit
‘The U.S. needs national review of outward investment to China, but it has to be narrow and targeted and done in conjunction with our allies and partners.’
keep reading
July 10, 2023
‘Is Xi Coup-proof?’ (after the march on Moscow, I have to ask)
What about the guys without guns? So if Mr. Xi doesn’t face a rogue army or a military coup… How about a coup by Party elites?
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Q&A 4 | Is China Exporting Inflation?
'‘China has its own issues. If you look at the CPI inflation, it looks more moderate. ‘If you look at the producer price inflation, it looks more severe.’
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Q&A 2 | Will the Gender Imbalance Keep Housing Prices Firm in the Medium Term?
‘The part of housing prices caused by gender-ratio imbalance is not going to go away in the medium term. But the government has ways to create volatility in the housing market.’
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Q&A 3 | Property 2022: Stabilization or Growth?
‘The goal is to stabilize housing prices while having housing sector grow.’
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Shang-jin Wei Presentation-3 | Analyzing the Gender Imbalance Data
‘Compare these with graph showing the impact of the same factors on rental prices...'
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Shang-jin Wei Presentation-2 | Gender Imbalance as a Driver of Housing Prices
‘Why does gender imbalance have such an outsize impact on China’s housing prices?'
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Q&A 5 | Will Xi Continue to Favor the State Over the Private Sector?
‘He wants to see a bigger role for the state in the economy. But in the last two years, he has done some course correction. For example, after talking up the role of state-owned firms and building stronger, bigger state-owned firms, he is talking about the equal importance for the private sector.’
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Q&A 7 | Why Did Beijing Ban Online Tutoring?
‘Each policy in isolation – whether its banning online tutoring or protecting data or enforcing anti-monopoly regulations or any other - has its rationale.’
keep reading
December 30, 2021
What Are Your Top of Mind Concerns?
I asked the participants what are their top of mind concerns about China.
keep reading
December 7, 2021
Getting (Xi Jingping's) Priorities Straight
How do you make investment or business decisions in the face of the uncertainties created by Xi Jinping's reshaping China's economy? In this issue, I'll give you a few different ideas on how you might deal with that uncertainty.
keep reading
December 7, 2021
Look Through the Rights Lenses
Getting down more to the nitty-gritty, if you’re evaluating a sector or a company, get your lenses right to get the details right.. Stonehorn’s Sam Le Cornu gives a good example of this in a Bloomberg interview.
keep reading
December 7, 2021
Sometimes You Just Have to Roll the Dice
Telling someone to align him or herself with Beijing's priorities still is generally good advice.And, when I tell you what those priorities are, I know I am right - until I'm not.
keep reading
December 7, 2021
Watch What Beijing Says - and Does
Besides listening to Xi Jinping, you can discern Beijing’s priorities and its likely actions through its big policies - and this is my point here.
keep reading
November 23, 2021
'Biden Has a Summit With Xi, but No Strategy for China'
‘Neither Taiwan nor strategic arms are a hot campaign topic, and China is not yet at the forefront of public consciousness. To ensure America’s eventual strategy is workable, political leaders need to debate the challenges so citizens can appreciate the implications of the choices they will have to make.’
keep reading
November 23, 2021
Xi Jinping's Leadership: 'The Inevitable Outcome of History'
Mr. Xi is the hero of a Resolution on the history of the Chinese Communist Party that painted his leadership as the inevitable outcome of history and all but gave him his third term. Tony Saich of the Harvard Kennedy School did a terrific analysis on this - you'll find it below, after my take.
keep reading
November 23, 2021
'Xi Jinping has made sure history is now officially on his side'
‘While there are murmurs of opposition, the historic plenary session would suggest that the future is in Xi’s hands. However, when politics is so deeply personalised and centralised, there is only one person to blame if things go wrong. Unless, of course, we get a new resolution on history that tells us who led the party astray, despite Xi’s earnest attempts to keep policy on the straight and narrow.’
keep reading
November 9, 2021
'America's China Plan: A Proposal' by Clyde Prestowitz
Outcompeting China and avoiding global extension of its authoritarian and coercive policies and practices is not really about China. It’s about America.
keep reading
October 27, 2021
Why China Won't Invade Taiwan - Yet
Forget Evergrande and the energy crunch. After the recent flurry of alarming headlines, here’s the question I get most often these days from CEO’s and institutional investors: Will China invade Taiwan in the next few years?
keep reading
October 17, 2021
An Energy Crunch. China's Latest Crisis. They Just Keep Piling Up.
‍‘Over the next six months or more, the energy crunch in China will be an even bigger challenge than Evergrande. Will make the Evergrande problem look tiny and has huge global implications. The lights go out in China!’ one experienced and very well-respected reader of long residence in China wrote to me in response the last issue on Evergrande.
keep reading
October 7, 2021
Just How Contagious is Evergrande?
Just as a personal crisis can lead you to dig deeper into yourself, so the rapid-fire events in China - with trillions of dollars of business and investment on the line - have led us to (finally) go deeper into how China works – and to come to grips with uncertainties caused by Xi Jinping’s recent moves to reshape the Chinese economy and the Party’s social contract with the Chinese people.
keep reading
September 27, 2021
'This Time Feels Different'
Just when we thought we were getting used to Xi Jinping’s tech reforms and social-engineering regulations, the Evergrande crisis heats up.
keep reading
September 19, 2021
AUKUS: A New World Order?
‍In case you passed over the news of AUKUS, the new strategic alliance among the U.S, the U.K., and Australia, here a few headlines to encourage a deeper look.
keep reading
September 7, 2021
Xi Jinping: Today, video games. Tomorrow, well ... just be good.
Today's issue is a heads up on what may be Xi Jinping's efforts to reshape Chinese society.
keep reading
August 28, 2021
The Taliban: 'China's Perfect Partner'?
Breaking through the blow-by-blow reporting that started when the Taliban began its sweep to victory are the geopolitical analyses of who gains and who loses in Afghanistan.
keep reading
August 15, 2021
'Xi’s Dictatorship Threatens the Chinese State'
‘Mr. Xi is determined to bring the creators of wealth under the control of the one-party state.’
keep reading
August 15, 2021
'Are you tired of losing yet, America?'
As I write this, Taliban forces have entered Kabul and are reportedly occupying the Presidential Palace.
keep reading
August 15, 2021
China Economy: Industrial Production Down, Demand Resilient
China’s industrial production down 10%. Demand resilient.
keep reading
August 15, 2021
'China Signals More Regulation for Businesses in Coming Years'
‘The State Council’s statement provides a guiding context to interpret current regulatory thrusts. The blueprint as an attempt by Chinese authorities to help investors understand the motives behind the regulatory push.’
keep reading
August 5, 2021
‘Global investors shocked to have discovered that China is run by Communists.’
‘Global investors are shocked to have discovered that China is run by Communists.’
keep reading
August 5, 2021
'Shocked Investors Scour Xi’s Old Speeches to Find Next Target'
‘While China’s policy moves can feel ad hoc particularly to foreign investors, the changes are quite targeted on certain sectors.’
keep reading
August 5, 2021
Don't Say Xi Jinping Didn't Warn You
‘Global investors are shocked to have discovered that China is run by Communists.’
keep reading
August 5, 2021
'China Wants Manufacturing—Not the Internet—to Lead the Economy'
‘Social media, e-commerce and other consumer internet companies are nice to have. But in his view national greatness doesn’t depend on having the world’s finest group chats or ride-sharing.’
keep reading
August 1, 2021
'Stock Market: China Doesn’t Care How Much Money Investors Lose'
‘Does Beijing not care how much money foreign investors have lost? Does the government really want to close China Inc.’s access to the deep pool of global capital? The short answer is, no, the government doesn’t care.
keep reading
August 1, 2021
'Xi's Four Pillars of Regulation'
‘Broadly, Beijing is concerned about four pillars of stability: banking, anti-trust regulation, data security and social equality. All of Beijing’s major interventions reflect these concerns.’
keep reading
August 1, 2021
China's Tech Crackdown: 'Nobody Saw It Coming.' — Huh?
‘Carnage in China's financial markets signals the beginning of a new era as the government puts socialism before shareholders, and regulatory changes rip apart the old playbook,’ writes Reuters’ Tom Westbrook.
keep reading

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.