CHINAMacroReporter

AUKUS: A New World Order?

‍In case you passed over the news of AUKUS, the new strategic alliance among the U.S, the U.K., and Australia, here a few headlines to encourage a deeper look.
by

|

CHINADebate

September 19, 2021
AUKUS: A New World Order?

In case you passed over the news of AUKUS, the new strategic alliance among the U.S, the U.K., and Australia, here a few headlines to encourage a deeper look:

Is this the start of a new world order?

  • Or is it perhaps a capstone on the glacial shift of recalcitrant nations to stand up to China?

To become a new world order, more of those countries, especially in the EU – and the EU itself – will have to get on board.

  • The current indications are that they are, however slowly.

BTW the leaders of the QUAD – the U.S., Australia, Japan, & India – will meet this week at the White House.

  • More on the QUAD later.

1 | Biden’s China Policy Muddled No More?

‘Biden's muddled China policy’ is the headline of Jonathan Swan’s piece in Axios. Mr. Swan writes:

  • ‘President Biden came into office with a plan for dealing with China that sounded great in theory but's failing in practice.’
  • Reminds me of heavyweight champ Mike Tyson’s quip: ‘Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.’

However much China may seem to have punched the U.S. in the month – and on that Mr. Swan is correct - theory and practice came together last week.

  • The theory: Bring allies into concert in the U.S. effort to confront China.
  • The practice: ANUKUS

AUKUS, as you have no doubt read, is a new Indo-Pacific security alliance among the U.S., the UK, and Australia – the anglosphere minus Canada and New Zealand.

  • The centerpiece of the new security pact: The U.S. and the UK will equip Australia with at least eight nuclear-powered submarines and transfer U.S. nuclear sub technology (the U.S. has only done that once before, to the UK in 1958).

With this, Australia will become the 7th nation to have such weapons, along with the U.S., the UK, France, India, Russian, & China.

  • (Note: Australia’s new subs will carry conventional – not nuclear – weapons, like long-range Tomahawk missiles. But experts have said that in a pinch, these could be swapped out for nukes.)

The subs won’t be delivered for at least a dozen years.

  • So more immediately, the allies will ‘deepen cooperation on a range of defense capabilities for the 21st century, including artificial intelligence, cyber, quantum technologies, and various undersea capabilities.’

To make the deal, Australia scrapped a contract with France to supply conventional subs.

  • What hurt more than that was that French president Macron was not invited to join the alliance – even the negotiations where kept secret from him.
  • Blindsided and livid, Macron protested and withdrew his ambassadors to the U.S. and Australia.

Throughout all the announcements, the three nations’ leaders never mentioned China as the target of AUKUS.

  • In fact, the three leaders were at some pains to claim: ‘China? China? Never entered our minds.’
  • Their deputies were more direct.

And China, quite rightly from its point of view, squawked.

2 | Why The Subs Are A Big Deal

‘In its previous calculations, China’s military only had to contend with possible interference from the US and Japanese navies as it sought military dominance over its near seas, especially in the waters around Taiwan,’ wrote the Financial Times:

  • Admiral Lee Hsi-ming, a former chief of the general staff of Taiwan’s armed forces, told the FT:

“Nuclear powered submarines give Australia strategic deterrence and attack capabilities for the first time.” ’

  • ‘ “They will be able to not just protect their own sea lanes of communication but deploy far from home. Add to that the Tomahawk missiles, and [Australia’s] fist will reach right to mainland China.” ’
  • ‘Lee added that “the logical area for deployment of those submarines would be the deep waters of the western Pacific [near] Taiwan”.’

‘“There is not much the People’s Liberation Army can do to counter this new capability,” he said.’

  • ‘ “Long-range anti-submarine warfare is one of the most sophisticated and risky operations, and it will take longer for the PLA to master it than it will take for Australia’s nuclear submarines to be built and deployed.” ’

Vipin Narang, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor who studies the use of nuclear weapons and delivery systems among major powers, told The New York Times:

  • ‘ “Attack submarines are big deal, and they send a big message,”
  • ‘ “This would be hard to imagine five years ago, and it would have been impossible 10 years ago. And that says a lot about China’s behavior in the region.” ’

Oriana Skylar Mastro, who is a fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University and at the American Enterprise Institute, told The New York Times:

  • ‘ “Nothing is more provocative to China than nuke stuff and submarine stuff." '
  • ' “China’s so weak in anti-submarine warfare in comparison to other capabilities." '
  • ‘ “To me,” said Ms. Mastro, a regular visitor to Australia, “it suggests that Australia is willing to take some real risks in its relationship to stand up to China.” ’

Here’s why Australia is willing to take those risks.

3 | What Got Into Australia?

Of the many headlines that have appeared since AUKUS was announced, one of my favorites is from The New York Times:

From that article:

  • ‘With its move to acquire heavy weaponry and top-secret technology, Australia has thrown in its lot with the United States for generations to come — a “forever partnership,” in Australian PM Morrison’s words.’
  • ‘The agreement will open the way to deeper military ties and higher expectations that Australia would join any military conflict with Beijing.’
  • ‘It’s a big strategic bet that America will prevail in its great-power competition with China and continue to be a dominant and stabilizing force in the Pacific even as the costs increase.’

So why make that bet now? I’ve watched Australia’s relations with its biggest natural resource buyer (and major mine investor), China, because of the interest in commodities of my hedge fund clients.

  • For years, I've watched as Australia has tried to balance its traditional ties with the U.S. with its dependence on China’s buying Australia’s commodity exports such as iron ore for its rapid industrialization.

In 2015, Australia and China agreed to a free-trade deal and that led to record Chinese investment in the country the following year.

  • Soon things went south. For example, Australia alleged that China was interfering in its politics and banned Huawei from its 5G rollout.

Then Australia did the unthinkable:

  • It called for an independent inquiry into the origins of the COVID pandemic.

And China went all ‘wolf warrior’ on Australia:

  • It imposed steep tariffs on Australian barley, suspended beef imports from some Australian slaughterhouses, and slapped antidumping tariffs on Australian wine, among other trade penalties.

In the face of this bullying, Australia has hung tough.

  • And now it’s had enough and is 'betting the house' on the U.S.

Speaking about China’s behavior, Peter Jennings, executive director of think tank Australian Strategic Policy Institute told the AP:

  • ‘ “China is the strategic problem in the region.” ’
  • ‘ “Australia’s decision to acquire nuclear submarines was a response to China’s increasing military might, aggressive bullying of Australia and intimidation of Japan and Taiwan.” ’

‘ “I’m sure Beijing will not like this development but what do they expect? It’s obviously going to be the case that the consequential countries in the region will seek to strengthen themselves in order to deal with a more aggressive China, and frankly that’s what happened with this announcement.” ’

  • ‘ “We should call the first submarine in this new category the ‘Xi Jinping,’ because no person is more responsible for Australia going down this track than the current leader of the Chinese Communist Party.” ’

If other Asian countries begin to stand up to China, this pretty much sums up why.

4 | What Does AUKUS Mean For China?

Here’s a view from China from Li Haidong, a professor at the Institute of International Relations of China Foreign Affairs University, who told the Global Times [a Chinese Communist publication] that AUKUS is at the core of the US alliance system to contain China with extreme hostility, and it should not be underestimated.’

  • ‘ "The US is using the same approach employed to contain Russia in Europe after the Cold War to contain China in the Asia-Pacific region. Washington is building a NATO-like alliance in the region, with AUKUS at the core, and the US-Japan and US-South Korea alliances surrounding it, and the Quad [U.S., Australia, Japan, and India] at the outermost level, because India, not an US ally, can't be trusted by the US," Li said.’
  • Below is a chart that summarizes Dr. Li’s point:

AUKUS

Note: Keep a sharp out for alliances and strengthening of relations among Asia countries, some with no U.S. involvement whatsoever.

  • As Dr. Li stressed: ‘These small groups of alliances can realize mutual reliance and form a big alliance led by the US to contain China. "So the threat and challenge that China is being confronted with are critical and serious," Li stressed.’

If AUKUS is the start of a new world order, the order will be inspired by but not always led by the U.S.

  • And that's a good thing if we want this new world order to be robust and inclusive.

More

CHINAMacroReporter

August 24, 2023
Xi Jinping: 'The East is Rising' | Yes. Rising against China
All our careful analyses of PLA capabilities, the parsing of Mr. Xi’s and Mr. Biden’s statements, the predictions as to the year of the invasion, everything – all out the window. This is one you won’t see coming – but one you have to have prepared for.
keep reading
July 23, 2023
‘The U.S. Has Tactics, But No China Strategy’ | Bill Zarit
‘The U.S. needs national review of outward investment to China, but it has to be narrow and targeted and done in conjunction with our allies and partners.’
keep reading
July 10, 2023
‘Is Xi Coup-proof?’ (after the march on Moscow, I have to ask)
What about the guys without guns? So if Mr. Xi doesn’t face a rogue army or a military coup… How about a coup by Party elites?
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Q&A 4 | Is China Exporting Inflation?
'‘China has its own issues. If you look at the CPI inflation, it looks more moderate. ‘If you look at the producer price inflation, it looks more severe.’
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Q&A 2 | Will the Gender Imbalance Keep Housing Prices Firm in the Medium Term?
‘The part of housing prices caused by gender-ratio imbalance is not going to go away in the medium term. But the government has ways to create volatility in the housing market.’
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Q&A 3 | Property 2022: Stabilization or Growth?
‘The goal is to stabilize housing prices while having housing sector grow.’
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Shang-jin Wei Presentation-3 | Analyzing the Gender Imbalance Data
‘Compare these with graph showing the impact of the same factors on rental prices...'
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Shang-jin Wei Presentation-2 | Gender Imbalance as a Driver of Housing Prices
‘Why does gender imbalance have such an outsize impact on China’s housing prices?'
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Q&A 5 | Will Xi Continue to Favor the State Over the Private Sector?
‘He wants to see a bigger role for the state in the economy. But in the last two years, he has done some course correction. For example, after talking up the role of state-owned firms and building stronger, bigger state-owned firms, he is talking about the equal importance for the private sector.’
keep reading
December 30, 2021
Q&A 7 | Why Did Beijing Ban Online Tutoring?
‘Each policy in isolation – whether its banning online tutoring or protecting data or enforcing anti-monopoly regulations or any other - has its rationale.’
keep reading
December 30, 2021
What Are Your Top of Mind Concerns?
I asked the participants what are their top of mind concerns about China.
keep reading
December 7, 2021
Getting (Xi Jingping's) Priorities Straight
How do you make investment or business decisions in the face of the uncertainties created by Xi Jinping's reshaping China's economy? In this issue, I'll give you a few different ideas on how you might deal with that uncertainty.
keep reading
December 7, 2021
Look Through the Rights Lenses
Getting down more to the nitty-gritty, if you’re evaluating a sector or a company, get your lenses right to get the details right.. Stonehorn’s Sam Le Cornu gives a good example of this in a Bloomberg interview.
keep reading
December 7, 2021
Sometimes You Just Have to Roll the Dice
Telling someone to align him or herself with Beijing's priorities still is generally good advice.And, when I tell you what those priorities are, I know I am right - until I'm not.
keep reading
December 7, 2021
Watch What Beijing Says - and Does
Besides listening to Xi Jinping, you can discern Beijing’s priorities and its likely actions through its big policies - and this is my point here.
keep reading
November 23, 2021
'Biden Has a Summit With Xi, but No Strategy for China'
‘Neither Taiwan nor strategic arms are a hot campaign topic, and China is not yet at the forefront of public consciousness. To ensure America’s eventual strategy is workable, political leaders need to debate the challenges so citizens can appreciate the implications of the choices they will have to make.’
keep reading
November 23, 2021
Xi Jinping's Leadership: 'The Inevitable Outcome of History'
Mr. Xi is the hero of a Resolution on the history of the Chinese Communist Party that painted his leadership as the inevitable outcome of history and all but gave him his third term. Tony Saich of the Harvard Kennedy School did a terrific analysis on this - you'll find it below, after my take.
keep reading
November 23, 2021
'Xi Jinping has made sure history is now officially on his side'
‘While there are murmurs of opposition, the historic plenary session would suggest that the future is in Xi’s hands. However, when politics is so deeply personalised and centralised, there is only one person to blame if things go wrong. Unless, of course, we get a new resolution on history that tells us who led the party astray, despite Xi’s earnest attempts to keep policy on the straight and narrow.’
keep reading
November 9, 2021
'America's China Plan: A Proposal' by Clyde Prestowitz
Outcompeting China and avoiding global extension of its authoritarian and coercive policies and practices is not really about China. It’s about America.
keep reading
October 27, 2021
Why China Won't Invade Taiwan - Yet
Forget Evergrande and the energy crunch. After the recent flurry of alarming headlines, here’s the question I get most often these days from CEO’s and institutional investors: Will China invade Taiwan in the next few years?
keep reading
October 17, 2021
An Energy Crunch. China's Latest Crisis. They Just Keep Piling Up.
‍‘Over the next six months or more, the energy crunch in China will be an even bigger challenge than Evergrande. Will make the Evergrande problem look tiny and has huge global implications. The lights go out in China!’ one experienced and very well-respected reader of long residence in China wrote to me in response the last issue on Evergrande.
keep reading
October 7, 2021
Just How Contagious is Evergrande?
Just as a personal crisis can lead you to dig deeper into yourself, so the rapid-fire events in China - with trillions of dollars of business and investment on the line - have led us to (finally) go deeper into how China works – and to come to grips with uncertainties caused by Xi Jinping’s recent moves to reshape the Chinese economy and the Party’s social contract with the Chinese people.
keep reading
September 27, 2021
'This Time Feels Different'
Just when we thought we were getting used to Xi Jinping’s tech reforms and social-engineering regulations, the Evergrande crisis heats up.
keep reading
September 19, 2021
AUKUS: A New World Order?
‍In case you passed over the news of AUKUS, the new strategic alliance among the U.S, the U.K., and Australia, here a few headlines to encourage a deeper look.
keep reading
September 7, 2021
Xi Jinping: Today, video games. Tomorrow, well ... just be good.
Today's issue is a heads up on what may be Xi Jinping's efforts to reshape Chinese society.
keep reading
August 28, 2021
The Taliban: 'China's Perfect Partner'?
Breaking through the blow-by-blow reporting that started when the Taliban began its sweep to victory are the geopolitical analyses of who gains and who loses in Afghanistan.
keep reading
August 15, 2021
'Xi’s Dictatorship Threatens the Chinese State'
‘Mr. Xi is determined to bring the creators of wealth under the control of the one-party state.’
keep reading
August 15, 2021
'Are you tired of losing yet, America?'
As I write this, Taliban forces have entered Kabul and are reportedly occupying the Presidential Palace.
keep reading
August 15, 2021
China Economy: Industrial Production Down, Demand Resilient
China’s industrial production down 10%. Demand resilient.
keep reading
August 15, 2021
'China Signals More Regulation for Businesses in Coming Years'
‘The State Council’s statement provides a guiding context to interpret current regulatory thrusts. The blueprint as an attempt by Chinese authorities to help investors understand the motives behind the regulatory push.’
keep reading
August 5, 2021
‘Global investors shocked to have discovered that China is run by Communists.’
‘Global investors are shocked to have discovered that China is run by Communists.’
keep reading
August 5, 2021
'Shocked Investors Scour Xi’s Old Speeches to Find Next Target'
‘While China’s policy moves can feel ad hoc particularly to foreign investors, the changes are quite targeted on certain sectors.’
keep reading
August 5, 2021
Don't Say Xi Jinping Didn't Warn You
‘Global investors are shocked to have discovered that China is run by Communists.’
keep reading
August 5, 2021
'China Wants Manufacturing—Not the Internet—to Lead the Economy'
‘Social media, e-commerce and other consumer internet companies are nice to have. But in his view national greatness doesn’t depend on having the world’s finest group chats or ride-sharing.’
keep reading
August 1, 2021
'Stock Market: China Doesn’t Care How Much Money Investors Lose'
‘Does Beijing not care how much money foreign investors have lost? Does the government really want to close China Inc.’s access to the deep pool of global capital? The short answer is, no, the government doesn’t care.
keep reading
August 1, 2021
'Xi's Four Pillars of Regulation'
‘Broadly, Beijing is concerned about four pillars of stability: banking, anti-trust regulation, data security and social equality. All of Beijing’s major interventions reflect these concerns.’
keep reading
August 1, 2021
China's Tech Crackdown: 'Nobody Saw It Coming.' — Huh?
‘Carnage in China's financial markets signals the beginning of a new era as the government puts socialism before shareholders, and regulatory changes rip apart the old playbook,’ writes Reuters’ Tom Westbrook.
keep reading

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.