Artsy and Ai Weiwei

Screen Shot 2014-10-14 at 10.24.24 AM

Among the many extraordinary resources on the Web is Artsy. Artsy describes itself this way..’Artsy’s mission is to make all the world’s art accessible to anyone with an Internet connection.’ And since it’s beginning two years ago Arty has made impressive strides toward accomplishing this. (Note that here ‘accessible’ includes selling works of art, which I presume is how Artsy makes money and takes nothing away from it usefulness.)

Readers here know that one of my favorite artists is Ai Weiwei. More importantly though he is one of my heroes for his bravery, in the face of persecution, in criticising and resisting those segments of the Chinese government that repress the Chinese people. Artsy came across these posts, and a couple of days ago I received this from Anthony Williams…

Hi Malcolm,
I was looking through your post that mentions Ai Weiwei but, unfortunately, couldn’t find any additional resources. I suggest linking to Artsy’s Ai Weiwei page as a solution for a missing resource.  We’ve been building out Artsy for the past 2 years, and now, we have editorial content, biographical material, exclusive images, and up-to-date exhibitions that is openly available to you and your audience.  Since you write about art, I thought you might be interested!


 As he suggested, I went to the Ai Weiwei page. Here I found a brief bio, some excellent posts, and nearly 100 photos  linked to related works and exhibitions. As a fan, I of course wanted more and noted omissions. Objectively though this is a terrific, one-stop, spot to survey the breadth of Ai Weiwei’s art and career. Highly recommend not only for those who are interested in contemporary art but especially for those who admire courage–Ai Weiwei is breaking more than Han vases.


Don’t Miss The TCFA’s Annual Conference, November 9, New York

TCFA 20th Annual Conference

U.S. and China in a Shifting Global Economic Order:

A Finance Perspective at TCFA’s 20th Anniversary

Main Conference – Sunday, November 9, 2014

Hilton Hotel
1335 Avenues of the Americas, New York, NY 10019

Register here!

The Chinese Finance Association (TCFA) is pleased to announce that the 20th TCFA Annual Conference entitled “U.S. and China in a Shifting Global Economic Order: A Finance Perspective at TCFA’s 20th Anniversary” will be held on Sunday, November 9th, 2014 at the New York Hilton Midtown in New York City.

This TCFA signature event provides an outstanding platform for industry leaders, academic experts, government regulators, and TCFA members to share thoughts on the latest developments in the global economy and the financial markets. This year’s conference will highlight the challenges faced by China and other emerging economies for continued growth; the increasing tension in geopolitical environment; and heightened pressure between the U.S. and China to collaborate on major global issues, given the still gradually recovering U.S. economy.

This year our distinguished keynote speakers include Dr. Robert Engle, Nobel Laureate in Economics and Michael Armellino Professor of Finance, Stern School of Business, New York University, and Boming Cheng (程博明), President, CITIC Securities (中信证券).

In addition, we will have many other prominent speakers from major investment banks, hedge funds, regulatory bodies, and other institutions, both from U.S. and China. Continue Reading

‘Asian Philanthropy: Strategic Social Stewardship’ by Angie Tang and Mercy Kuo

Mercy Kuo

Mercy Kuo

Mercy Kuo, CHINADebate’s Chief Strategy Officer,  and Angie Tang, Senior Advisor of Asia Value Advisors, a leading venture philanthropy advisory firm based

Angie Tang

Angie Tang

in Hong Kong, have published in The Diplomat ‘Asian Philanthropy: Strategic Social Stewardship.’  Portending a trend, Mercy and Angie, assert in the tagline ‘Philanthropy from the region is growing, despite some significant challenges.’

What I found especially interesting is this…


For many Asian HNWI families, wealth brings a sense of social responsibility. The characteristics of Asian philanthropy reflect cultural values. The family unit plays an important role in driving philanthropy in Asia, seeking out and reaping many benefits from philanthropy: “1) it teaches principles like compassion, courage and tolerance, 2) it fosters capacities for leadership, innovation and responsibility, and 3) it supports family cohesion by providing a common activity and goal for the family to pursue as a unit,” a 2011 UBS INSEAD philanthropy in Asia report explains.


The outlook for Asian philanthropy is promising, but there are myriad challenges. “The litmus test of effective philanthropy is not determined by how much is given, but whether the stewardship of that gift was properly administered and its intended outcomes were achieved,” observes Victor Kuo, former board member of the American Evaluation Association and founder of VK Global Advising. In China, pervasive state control and lack of regulatory accountability are formidable challenges in the country’s non-profit space. Despite such obstacles, Asian philanthropists and philanthropic entities affirm that universal values transcend national and cultural borders to benefit all of humanity.

 By defining the tension between characteristics and the challenges, Mercy and Angie provide a rough template for tracking Asia philanthropy’s growth or perhaps stifling.

Harvard’s Tony Saich on the Hong Kong Demonstrations



As the demonstrations in Hong Kong continue, I get calls and emails from CHINADebate Members, especially hedge funds concerned about what the impact will be on investments, asking what I think will happen. I have had to answer that I don’t know. Any serious impact would come from the actions of China’s leadership, and we don’t have any precedents from the Xi Jinping regime.

That said, insightful China watchers can give us analyses that will at least allow us to weigh expectations. Of these, one of my handful of go-to experts is Tony Saich.

Anthony Saich

Anthony Saich

Besides his positions as Daewoo Professor of International Affairs and Director Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at the Harvard Kennedy School, Tony Saich is, I am honored to say, a frequent speaker at the CHINARoundtable and a member of CHINADebate’s Advisory Council. And I am pleased to say that he will be a speaker at the November 11 CHINARoundtable.

Tony has commented on the demonstrations in Hong Kong in an interview with the Harvard Gazette  and in an op-ed in The Boston Globe, ‘Hong Kong Protesters Shouldn’t Push China Too Far.’   From the Harvard Gazette interview…

GAZETTE: Is the protest movement likely to change Beijing’s view, and if not, is there a resolution both sides could live with?

SAICH: I think it’s hard to see what the resolution is. I don’t think Beijing will back down on the decision that was made earlier. The demonstrators say that they have a number of core objectives, one of which is to rescind that decision, but also for [Leung] to step down. I don’t think they’re going to get the first. They may, through some maneuverings, get the second. Because the only tactic for Beijing, short of greater oppression, is to distance themselves and not say their decision was wrong, but to say that [Leung] and the senior Hong Kong leadership have implemented their control around the demonstrations poorly, and that they haven’t explained this sufficiently to the Hong Kong people, that they haven’t allowed sufficient negotiation — that might be one area of wiggle room for them. The only other hope is that if there’s not continued repression of the demonstrations, over time the enthusiasm might just fade away, and that might allow for a calming period where some kind of discussion could take place. But I think it’s very problematic for Beijing. In a sense, they are really losing a generation. You have a group of young people — college students, high school students — who’ve clearly expressed extreme dissatisfaction with the way Hong Kong is being managed. It’s hard to see what Beijing could do that would win back trust from that group, which is not a very promising situation for the future.

And for a fuller analysis, listen to Tony’s 13 minute  ‘The Aims and Aftermath of the Hong Kong Protests,’ on the Harvard Kennedy School PolicyCast.

Welcome to Mercy Kuo, CHINADebate’s Chief Strategy Officer

Mercy Kuo

Mercy Kuo

Mercy comes to us from the Committee of 100, where she was successively Director of Research and then Managing Director. The Committee of 100 describes itself in this way…

The Committee of 100 is an international, non-profit, non-partisan membership organization that brings a Chinese American perspective to issues concerning Asian Americans and U.S.-China relations. Our organization draws upon the collective experience, knowledge and resources of our members – Chinese Americans who have achieved prominence in a variety of fields and work in partnership towards our mission.

It is a who’s who of Chinese-Americans from Lucy Liu to Yo Yo Ma to Ronnie Chan and Victor Fung.

Close to my heart–and adding fuel to speculation that CHINADebate is a CIA cabal–Mercy also served for six years in the Agency’s Directorate of Intelligence.

I hope you will welcome Mercy, as we do, to the CHINADebate family.

Finally, here is her formal statement of background…

MERCY A. KUO | 郭恩憫

Mercy A. Kuo is Chief Strategy Office at CHINADebate.

She was formerly managing director and director of research at the Committee of 100, an international, non-profit leadership organization focused on strengthening US-China relations.

From 2006-2008, Dr. Kuo was a senior project director and director of the Southeast Asia Studies and Strategic Asia Programs at the National Bureau of Asian Research, a US-based foreign policy think tank.

She served with the Central Intelligence Agency as an analyst of Chinese foreign policy and Northeast and Southeast Asian political, security, and military issues from 2000-2006.

She was the first Chinese-American lecturer in the Sinology Department at the University of Warsaw in Poland and a visiting researcher at the Polish Academy of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Studies.

Her China-related publications include:

  • Contending with Contradictions: China’s Policy toward Soviet Eastern Europe and the Origins of the Sino-Soviet Split, 1953-1960 (Lexington 2001),
  • “China in the Year 2020: Bridging the Academic-Policy Gap with Scenario-Planning,” Asia Policy, Volume 4 (2007),
  • “Defence Policymaking in Strategic Asia,”Handbook of Defence Politics: International and Comparative Perspectives (Routledge, 2008),Strategic Asia 2008-09: Challenges and Choices—What the New President Should Know, (The National Bureau of Asian Research 2008), and
  • “China’s Strategic Orientation: Assessing Alternative Futures,” China in the 21st Century: History, Security and International Relations, Volume 3 (Praeger, April 2014).

She earned a Ph.D. in Modern History from Oxford University, M.A. in Chinese Studies from the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, and B.A. in Asian Studies from Pomona College in Claremont, California, and is proficient in Chinese, Polish and Italian.