BIG IDEA | ‘ “International relations scholars,” the political scientist Daniel Drezner has written, “are certain about two facts:'
• 'power is the defining concept of international relations and
• 'there is no consensus about what that concept means.” ’
‘Consider the question of how a declining United States should respond to a rising China.'
'But first, explain just what is rising and falling about each. Military strength? Economic potential? Perceptions about the long-term trends of those? Perceptions about the willingness to deploy them? The worth of each country’s alliances? Their national cohesiveness and institutional performance?'
‘Power obviously comes in multiple forms and depends on context. This means that the apparently straightforward question about the U.S.-Chinese power differential is actually quite complicated.’
The U.S. feels China’s breath on the back of its neck. And this is starting to generate assessments of just how close China is to overtaking America as the world’s leading power. Missing from most of these are the metrics. How do we measure power?
As the earlier comments show, China is gaining on the U.S. economically. But, even when China surpasses the U.S., does that alone relegate America to the number two spot? The answer of course is no.